- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old& q! k4 [/ J* Z% ]& |3 O7 q0 E
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
/ V f- Z- G+ L, |0 F# D: ]Exposure to Testosterone5 B2 Z) D' ^# r, a
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
2 |3 _& y2 _4 Y- x1 L' Band Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1* d" r* N; H5 r( T& ]" n
Clinical Pediatrics% l) x/ [# T9 f* O, I- _+ h8 X5 B
Volume 46 Number 6
N: n6 M' v2 D) w9 U1 LJuly 2007 540-543
) d# ^( Y+ P- C. o) x( i8 g© 2007 Sage Publications
3 ]$ f+ {1 U0 _10.1177/00099228062966515 y- S. { |9 r8 \
http://clp.sagepub.com0 q* G% U0 x/ b
hosted at
! @, t, \3 `; B ^, ~http://online.sagepub.com& s7 E3 o) {( p) W! W% x) {) l
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,* L5 b! D# \) f8 V3 P+ k% U
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
( T* t- S* f; K5 d" B9 yprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated& y$ E) k+ f" a6 U; W; d
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has) A5 H+ o, w) f3 F
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
- P. d8 f* ?# A# ~1 Vlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested2 T. \6 g+ e3 s. W/ M, H& o
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic4 R1 e& N# H6 `% y
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
2 k! s1 o; L4 ?/ E* \cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We! P9 B% s' y! I
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
. F6 k5 ^( Q2 _; f, n$ u' u2 Kenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
( y( t$ G D; w- K8 k7 [/ Zment without testicular enlargement, which was due' W/ m7 J, d- o+ e9 p" [1 X4 Q9 U
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by7 B% S! Z/ m" N& v
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-0 a" S+ Y5 i/ b7 n
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
+ E1 y C( |! v @child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
, H, c$ \1 k7 qtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-- y. s6 J+ I. S7 Q0 L: y
bly more common than the rare case report in the
6 u+ M- m% T2 I" tliterature.4
7 B R* p7 F7 V8 jPatient Report! F& u$ D; H2 h1 n& I+ R8 M
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the) e" q Z/ w. ?$ V/ B' L' }
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
- I6 U0 G. ? b1 e, S, i6 S2 eof early sexual development. His mother noticed
. f# B/ }$ O2 ]( y( o6 J" zlight colored pubic hair development when he was- M- V+ K4 c( k# a5 X' Q
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of' i! v7 U8 K4 [
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.. W6 @( S, l! o
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
4 f8 l6 @: ~) ^# {8 iProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of0 H/ a: T9 z8 g0 R5 H4 `* K
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;1 q# x- f H7 b9 H6 m2 M
e-mail: [email protected].
1 B! h3 x2 E, }* n1 J1 B {about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
% C0 Z4 |# e2 `6 c" U4 Y" l# Fdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
. S Z4 F5 {) G. lment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
& j1 _5 Z; ~+ @7 q, mwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with6 e5 o! t3 Z+ H5 G9 M6 l3 n6 D
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of G3 m7 j; v) G8 I
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
3 P# ]2 b5 p, Y" Zof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
/ }+ c R5 S1 Nsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,: I& ~4 E6 Z# _+ J
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development0 y! I" \% B0 B
was age appropriate.
& e8 R, |2 t, D# E: Y% oThe family history was remarkable for the father,3 ?# S; J- y, k. H
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,+ _8 M& h* _) n
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s, c# a9 O! H0 K; |/ t$ n4 D& s# E
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat# U. |6 e* D5 Q8 Y& P: W" j
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
: W2 B' k# o+ M$ G9 |, P/ uThe father denied taking any other medication. The. Y" L6 Y* l; [" p7 t3 z' a0 l
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
9 U. S. A3 D. \: wwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
/ ?9 y, h8 g! _ ^2 |5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-" a! O! N% R: p+ S' A8 |" o4 }
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
3 m5 H5 @7 c1 ]3 N l$ K, ^2 \tives. There were no siblings.
* X: c' _ X5 N, T2 t$ oPhysical Examination
/ p0 g5 u8 j& T( y+ zThe physical examination revealed a very active,
0 w8 Y8 ]2 [9 G6 Wplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented" m5 e2 L+ S; ~+ j5 B
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was7 x& } T% G1 G/ |0 v
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg" E0 d; }* h7 n+ c8 ]
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth1 L* _" f, ]* X- `+ W
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
/ \8 U' r; d, P" N# ^; ~the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
& a" {& V, O6 Y2 J0 PThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for, O: {" k! g5 A! \: d
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
# i2 j p/ ^) A% x, o% ]5 m& e3 Z9 J' n8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well$ C, g0 B, P& H) w) x0 C1 R* p2 g
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
& f/ P# C. ^7 d5 B* Z5403 E) l6 k) V5 W
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from+ m8 P' H) L2 p0 |
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The$ Y' j! q! ?9 y$ K6 M: g n8 B
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
/ g3 |. X( l4 G$ K* b' j! J! z% G. W tThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
; E8 Z- A( v8 @oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
+ w- w ?% p4 }abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.' c: f5 j3 O" L6 ^5 q" H
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
9 z$ x, N) B2 S. l" lbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion5 |1 t( L1 s+ M2 O. t
of papilledema.
. v- j4 f( c9 L5 w2 ^6 uLaboratory Evaluation8 Y: W$ Z5 X. H4 L7 J: N X
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
I) P8 z: I% c1 Q1 l/ @using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-0 N+ k+ z6 W/ w; o: b
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
2 D: `' Y s. lkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test, ? }+ L" H" V+ {
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-2 ~3 x8 R. a3 H- Y
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).% R9 b( \1 c7 K- f5 Z! [
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
, \; S* r5 t* n9 \urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
1 c j" T+ C+ z; o* A3 Xwithin normal range for his age. The concentration6 r/ v/ x6 w; C. X" N. U% t; b W
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
/ W; V/ k! k% t9 q. [' m(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
# P$ L. s9 y, M# ]8 zng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
. x' y6 P& j4 h5 l5 M- f, |7 F3 nterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
: e, X* S8 X/ C: H% G& Idesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
8 O5 Q" r' F5 Z5 F6 m, O% P: n+ z49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)4 c/ u [6 n( n! y F/ _( h, j
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
$ X7 E3 r1 S& q% R% [tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
4 Y7 O9 s# R. K2 Wtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
. G6 X2 B) G$ _: x6 Z7 Aand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than' w. x% M9 f6 |9 R" r- F, q2 T* ?
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular& O7 L8 c7 c% ?' C5 P \, l
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone4 T# `! s5 d5 t1 C5 }3 H
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
- P7 {; J u j, ](prepubertal).0 W9 T3 A, X2 D m
The parents were notified about the laboratory; o r. x( ]% J+ D. ~9 Z' g5 M' f
results and were informed that all of the tests were
! Z) D2 v7 f1 j! dnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
" b; O9 o. ]1 l4 rfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to0 `' H$ C& N% {; X
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-0 `+ |/ _# { [2 u! C! g
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.! p# d& {1 s5 W% b4 l& z3 z
Physical examination at this time revealed that the/ a7 Q1 T, m, @5 `. g
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained( c/ v3 q: T! X. J; u
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
, n! C4 a9 P+ A0 X! }+ ?unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-, e7 U( [; l; {9 F. c* G9 o( E: l( A
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at& O) L1 H. A1 W% a1 p, N4 s
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
6 l4 [% b& K( F' ] z* i7 n- GmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.( ~7 l' M4 }5 k! C7 B; ~+ `
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-2 g7 m! ?: S8 G) ^ k
ing frequent erections.0 t# }. ~8 {" T4 W+ O i
Both parents were again questioned about use of
) I) j3 g' ]8 I- j2 g \any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
7 t4 w* r$ k0 V5 N9 ^+ Lthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
8 U4 @3 N+ k8 i+ O5 kTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
. S5 C% }8 L! g' Quse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
2 Y3 F- _! G- u3 }) g8 e/ Zing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
0 @6 }, C. j0 O6 M0 Sa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
0 L. y$ ?% Q5 g6 Y bto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-# j( w% O6 t3 o9 C& O A0 x
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
! K! ~0 `! F9 e( {4 nsecondary to depression.0 K# N/ _$ A5 S+ o
The child slept in the same bed with parents.* ^0 z7 ?- n" \. B4 m7 b% a
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
% E+ L) i2 \7 U& f5 {chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-. w/ @9 X% Y7 R; v. `# v
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
5 {$ ^, M8 f$ P. ~The father also admitted that after the phone call,
5 ]8 D' D$ R; o1 \: Uwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
# c7 i* e, O1 s7 o! }( Wwas high, he then read the product information
$ P; n2 M" v4 H2 X7 J% apacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
8 @; c; R* {6 `% d7 B' s' x% k0 ^son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they+ ~2 T, x/ \+ U- N
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
9 v" l6 G. Y" d0 R( k3 q1 ^father was not hugging him with bare skin and had3 d5 `# g2 g8 x J2 A" [
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
5 `5 P" V# v, @4 I& O$ ]test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
" Z: |7 i& E( Y" P, ~& Hlaboratory to obtain the test.: X4 w& C, i3 L
Discussion
+ ]6 R" b* }% z5 ^0 d: A/ g+ NPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary$ I2 f/ Q% r( S9 \
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4$ k; o6 C/ q8 ?/ h8 Q
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
% S* V& O& H* L- j2 E! mit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-# C @* h) v2 n( y0 U
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-- a, L: f; F3 W6 b
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP; d+ N3 t9 }& G0 E! | u% Y: s
may have a central nervous system lesion that is" f O! F# Y. q7 }. u0 R2 M9 }! Y2 y4 V
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-. y* Z# _5 N( r
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-% p) I7 r( L6 ]9 M- K
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in: z4 x% V k! i: D
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
+ V T* X- {" Zization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
q8 s* Y; |9 D. V2 V) vrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by4 Z, ]7 e2 F& F" q5 o6 f
gonadotropins.1,33 {: [5 `( `3 c0 E+ ^- _
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-$ z2 M+ c/ G9 P& P
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate# v g" a6 W" k% i l
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or& v/ \0 N8 v3 d# x. Y
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-6 \* D3 M2 e3 n$ ~8 T3 i
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing8 M$ \# H3 @! C7 | s
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive( s9 `2 G3 ~. p4 J1 V; n
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
) s% g3 W, P. D2 S' ?) Apuberty in boys.3,4# E6 R! Z0 K7 @3 N7 G- C
The most common form of congenital adrenal' W0 U6 B! x& k5 ?
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
+ \" j- U: |$ @7 aThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in! h2 ^) b, J5 a" ^0 h1 v' _
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
4 F4 }- ^: C" ?1 ]an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen1 ]7 b+ \) X* [5 _& V1 s0 P4 g
excess.1,3' i. U6 O# [8 x: l4 f
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from' b& g0 g% g1 u9 t# {
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
7 K; q/ S, s( w) ?" pA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-3 J5 T5 I/ R; V4 L: s- c1 B
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
* a, Q) O! M% g5 ^; |" Vas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a# r# ^6 }+ ^5 c U
very young age. The physical findings in these boys
F u) @# P3 o+ E- V8 awith this disorder are full pubertal development,0 N) V T, _$ q" |" @0 Y
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys; D+ K: s2 Q: ^ ~0 f
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder7 g: P5 q8 V: l! r1 y9 l8 Q
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show4 [, _- k! ^( |( z; y4 t
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-) V$ e) R) ^/ ?. V: z
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
4 p% J e; K2 F; Wautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
. v: G# \3 ^8 n0 G0 x* h* f: U2 Kmales; therefore, other male members of the family
8 t2 N$ M8 o2 {- Gmay have similar precocious puberty.3
$ e }8 q; }* B1 K- Z8 V; j+ q0 \8 XIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
& {+ A/ f+ k/ wsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
' y4 K! k. I( mcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
6 W) b5 d* [. z0 \. j- i; X! Kwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
' ]: y; W8 b$ @; G! M! ustarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
- S: k$ ?- ~6 O: Atesticular enlargement is not that evident in the+ a2 Z" `/ x' }
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
# E- _( g- k& v1 k/ a" }ative initial history of androgen exposure, our$ Z( L9 b' s) T7 J7 j
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
& A& ?' d. ]/ c9 U2 m, neither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase5 E7 C3 x- h( j# I- y$ q
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
# ^7 I* |2 W2 _7 {) Hing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
7 ~, k5 i- p) I. pThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly q: f2 X" ?: P1 Q& q! O
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because3 f8 q- U) j, E8 Q: {1 V+ E8 S
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-: E" e( r2 U+ v. v' B D3 ?3 `: d
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and* O/ a& m& ]' \
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
: a( `, P% ~* Z* Q) {6 Q; {! }terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was( X( ^& V2 h3 ^ @0 B7 G
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
; S- ^1 M4 d5 P( rDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
) l& s. E! J/ u3 ]2 Hcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to% J& O: G3 U) Z* Q" F5 r1 F
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.( P2 s! Q" R3 C H2 Y, n
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
1 j7 `; j! @" j6 I8 a. nbaseline value in those females who were exposed to- \- u7 D- g' S9 s, i5 B, Z
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
$ z* o6 _: m$ K1 v, q+ i( i2 Spartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
" y) ^4 ?$ _% B3 d9 X2 jtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
5 D3 N. W: e) B BOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
, v" b) X' B* Cwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
% n; K3 G8 ^$ ?8 J' N9 jdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
D) J3 O4 E# `& hterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
, s4 c1 ?" U8 ?6 }1 F# i/ Jactive in young children exposed to testosterone( [" @1 i& w& u( P% Q# _3 \: D, D1 o
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-. `/ [4 u5 t5 p/ F2 ?) P
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to6 Y( O$ Q& ]6 H* Q
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in3 ^2 T M( j% I
children results in an increase in growth velocity and2 }, z; k7 I5 I# O! Y8 G5 t
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
. C2 A7 K; w Y; D) r+ {0 WThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during) Z6 z* S, a4 C! U _
early childhood on pubertal development and final
9 u, A0 }9 N5 x' F; u$ ], g% G9 fadult height are not fully known and always remain9 [& |) M* z1 J2 Z
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-" K: {$ y6 q1 F6 h
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
( ^4 U! n* G4 K. z4 ]1 dacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
# X+ c9 O0 o' Dcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
( |) V! T2 |& C- h# E5 \; qdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9* s' a5 G# k8 F
There are conflicting reports and controversy% b$ q: V* |4 k7 q
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult7 {# O. g9 u& X. k: S
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal+ z1 G3 s8 F [6 d% g& a* B6 G
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
) a2 R/ K2 T k) D6 nulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,% S3 X5 ~8 Q* g! X9 @5 Z
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between) G. m3 b7 B% w8 _6 U
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult& Y# K& t. t0 w. j* P
penile length in clinical studies.
+ N4 Y) R7 J. ^6 I& L3 rNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
' z6 `. S" a; {2 }$ c* v. q0 F/ Ogoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
1 d7 ?- p3 r v0 A( r. G; Ctestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because: c$ S; T: v, C8 l% n
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.7 _) N( H' c o) m! L
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of5 f) Z/ T- s2 h# H2 s) Z
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at. h( @6 q9 W& P6 R- @' K2 ?+ g
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult4 H. E' ? G* y9 k5 W: O: E
height will not be affected.! `6 `0 ^' m7 U+ C/ b% Q
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-
7 O6 x) B/ L' t( h3 Xability of androgen products in our society may
. K' I# x" E, Bindeed cause more virilization in male or female9 e2 ~6 h B, ~( t5 G8 e
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
3 O" z: `* |( Sgen products must be considered and specific ques-
7 v% V8 J2 V6 s: c1 Ltioning about the use of a testosterone product or
+ ^: [, f9 i/ ^) B6 m& ?, xgel should be asked of the family members during, I' |- ^" u, j) K
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
' R, {7 O( D/ T ~6 Z$ kilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-- l' y2 x% O: `- y& E9 d9 F6 Z, d
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by& Z: d- B6 D7 I* m5 w
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
6 w5 {% |9 X9 |! rhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may5 s" i% Z2 X( s9 h5 U* Z
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
- Z; _& W) A* ^$ Q7 p! [% uinvestigation. The primary care physician should be
% G6 f( @( x1 e3 _aware of this fact, because most of these children
a" ~/ r# |/ _6 @/ L, w5 Kmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’ P i6 a$ W. y% J3 r v! y
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a( G8 v; X) b- ]( T' R7 Q) @
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or2 Y) B8 |# k3 V" ~9 d. A9 J( A+ b
female child who might come in contact with some-3 E$ c! c2 p+ N" e5 g3 N- A
one using any of these products.! ?& f9 w+ E' {
References
" G( k# r( d8 B" @1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation: } o" z6 G$ V; b- l8 S
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
, i2 } V) P* a* mEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
, o" r3 I# t6 ?9 Q7 F0 D; V1 c3 I2002: 565-628.. l# v0 V8 N2 f, w7 e8 O
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
- i% q: \0 J' x) o3 q% y* }+ m4 Z+ ]puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|