WK綜合論壇, WK综合论坛

 找回密碼
 立即注册
查看: 325|回復: 2

[日韓] 雪白纯净的美女老师,让体育生玩的全身都在舒爽 [30P]

[複製鏈接]
累計簽到:1 天
連續簽到:1 天
發表於 2024-9-20 20:41:18 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
  b2 f( a' m& g) @6 z

* _, M, L0 q. ^5 F4 G$ D! |5 ~* m7 E. H0 i5 L3 Q6 j- F$ Z7 ^

, \5 _3 I* Y3 m% I0 U+ l9 W3 F7 Y1 N' C* h6 h2 F

/ h# o! ?; N6 b+ N  F6 J% M7 o1 N: t* E! U  h# k
7 G3 [! X5 |  {, V$ R/ u( v
9 y: w9 o5 ~; o/ ^
- |' S2 |' K+ n1 Y4 X. |# w
  ]7 m( y1 |8 N; }1 ^$ z
; l9 y! C1 C4 F6 ?% m! U8 l5 N
# M* |6 \4 }7 v! J/ Y' ]% G
3 H8 ^/ ^3 `7 Z
$ j8 Y8 u- `* I- e$ `" v
# e* a& i- S# r- d
; R# @2 s- ~) O6 \
! Z: y; q" d: J% q5 t) F

3 i4 |3 _& Z3 A) U$ {# q9 u! T6 P& c6 v9 C7 V& M+ W6 z
  [: r* C$ B! |2 l( |; S, q

! @8 o9 h$ f  Q4 X- a# N. G" [2 v1 m) D; z1 n4 d

- ]; Y/ b' ^/ g! o4 ~. [' M7 ?
' ?- ?2 {) d5 X; v) [! j* H; B# N" g# X9 S2 n7 P0 T' Y

8 H6 x; e  A: q' @$ d; U- U
" d& C5 ]& _" I& y1 Z
0 ~: @/ g2 @! Z6 L& L1 s8 T+ O1 S
9 e% ^) p3 d, n+ g: K6 W. r; I
- O8 ^; V! h' u0 h" y  V* Q5 ?- l! `0 A5 U8 |

, R' m' j6 |- o  I% L1 v1 r$ ^9 z, [6 u) ~+ _! p) V  b2 y& f

4 i* J: f7 W2 }5 W+ y# A7 a) Y4 `& T; B) |: x* T) r4 T

0 Y8 h9 K0 J/ i% V$ ~
( x* j" @2 ~; h0 x9 E( u5 M+ a( b6 ~
% s  K* q6 T3 ]/ z& H

  E; N: ^: M6 E$ R, v$ \$ I
  J: V8 Z/ p% J: Y" i- w- Y* ?9 \( X$ g+ h( W9 c, R4 H
& O" q# g3 m. E# J
, h+ f% l# q, b2 F7 e( t

; r9 l, ~0 G1 U" U. F  C- L
3 d/ {- }6 g0 J9 d' g+ D6 e$ j! }! C$ h# C
& j' F2 h/ N2 C" F; @$ h0 a

3 V! g% H0 V& z! \) u
( \& _1 r$ v3 K- X/ x' S" d; k. j/ H3 j

1 ]( N  B% c5 F7 S0 J9 T3 [8 A/ P/ s4 _3 ]+ M2 I
4 b# @, @  W' x# N* F9 h, f

3 b+ m& @9 g- \) K& H
# _0 v! i& n& @, G. N" h3 u, x) l/ _' w8 q! p5 O' |
* _, b& {' {' _# T. E

5 r4 z! b& K( ?0 [- t" ]4 n5 O: m, p4 C
回復

舉報

累計簽到:5 天
連續簽到:1 天
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33 | 顯示全部樓層
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy
) \* m  e) k( e) t! Z' rPenile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
( a4 O3 Z, x% [5 D# ^male newborns: epidemiology and influence of
+ N, c" q$ I) A9 v. R7 a, M3 s9 m; \endocrine disruptors
* b9 n# D. W' M' f; H& JAbstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal
: C, e$ s* F, U! V; \7 lstretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
7 l9 J/ ^9 H+ V- X* a6 D  }tal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
: ]& H) T! [; q# m3 Q5 lare influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-6 ?5 t5 e( y7 l; k; b& e- O& q
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were- L, u4 r( P) C5 w
included; their mothers were subjected to the following
$ n: k/ Y/ h0 Z3 X5 iquestionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-' T' \* }" z6 D4 o* E
tact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure% w# L) o4 ]- P; U7 X) o
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
/ j* K+ B$ C3 g: Banomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro
; E( T- J) B- d9 X! w  x8 Zfertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured9 o$ e! ?- {4 @1 {( K
in 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length
7 Q! z0 ]; |( I+ g4 j& Bwas 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered
- T: T6 s/ d! Z" g1 N% z8 Smicropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %5 T3 w  h: I" F  L/ Y, G" z
(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-3 ~* Y3 E) [; Z8 L
lies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )$ u  ?  j* h* f/ h1 ?+ U. D# ?
than in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,
7 {: g/ o# v$ n& f/ g95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed
" W! U7 i8 Z. H" A7 Pa linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower; u: B& L$ m8 W8 z4 u% ?. f* V
in neonates exposed to EDs.
4 r8 @5 T0 r, j& W" K3 n# EKeywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;
0 C0 x; K  q) E5 Xpenile length; testosterone.2 J, g8 a. Y7 a) U: Z* S
*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of/ @. y5 [' P# H/ B6 l# A, b
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36
% s8 w0 D& h1 m, Q$ W9 KHisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo
$ l# ]; _- N3 b/ U# P11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ," c+ s& J3 l3 e9 p3 x% i7 c
E-mail: [email protected]2 v: ], Q3 o- U" t
Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of: W  q- ]" V% y4 m
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
* J. Z; D4 V9 mEgypt2 d* I3 `, s# B
Introduction- I% _1 S0 u& a; \) s" v& p" e; e( {
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in! |3 h/ W6 O- a. t, F5 ^" m2 Z
the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
% A5 T" I& I$ a- j7 n$ p7 Eopment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
; \) o: n- \5 k7 n# rpenis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is
: g) `* k+ J% I5 x: W5 Rmore than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean+ r' }% ~( o/ ?
size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements
3 a- l. r' w6 Ncan be subject to significant international variations, in1 R4 _5 y! g' g+ W8 _
addition to being obtained with different methodologies
& A2 z  p6 G$ ]8 K1 @0 M& y/ ain some cases (2) .6 q4 W" Y3 t! ~, d7 H- T+ }$ E* J
Over the past 20 years, the documented increase in
" |* _( a' b4 O! J; j8 hdisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
& c9 \: N. }' L) \8 l( {spadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the
/ _8 \' ^' f: `+ L. P$ Qsuspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental  c. d/ h: f3 {  b, F7 t) V$ Q
to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-8 i5 m8 h8 d5 g+ t* _1 T
called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible$ g: q# E, _. [/ U- r
common cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-
5 ~3 Q) |% i- N. q6 mmalities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to
5 b) {5 ]2 v; d$ g5 boestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
/ H  h4 `4 H, ~' o2 ?of fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated7 R* X, e; N7 h" c2 I
developmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality
2 m  Q  Y' S7 _$ wof semen (4) .2 ]; l' W# d" x: N) i+ X' L
It has been proposed that these disorders are part of
7 D8 F- @: U* ?3 y0 ~9 ma single common underlying entity known as the testicu-2 \% L) L( z6 l6 d1 f
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various8 {- Z8 u# g8 s
aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,
2 \- Y" j/ C1 q8 ~' q9 {/ p* [including abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,
( z& V% A5 v3 ?* |/ Qhypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .
$ t. [$ ~( \/ x# XThe etiological basis for this condition is complex
% g% l. h. {; v0 k' |3 Qand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
5 V1 F/ L* L' s) Land environmental factors that result in the disruption4 m: Z( _; O8 K( ]/ r2 `8 Q% Y# F
of normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,5 A; _2 L4 j5 o) }
it was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-& H% x1 L+ R; k+ ?/ k6 v
trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male' K/ f# u, M. T7 e% c3 L, F3 u( G
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to/ s! _- y) \0 y! w! w' G  N
include environmental chemicals with anti-androgen4 \9 L1 B1 w+ U0 n5 j+ v
actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between! z* h5 c) ]9 r
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by# d0 x$ s, O$ C/ K6 `' d* \
which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
8 x/ r  q7 e5 `9 T1 Xresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive1 j4 J, u+ l$ k0 K, k* G
tract abnormalities (5) .
7 y. ~; T- h: H6 d0 V$ J. g# p7 RWith the increasing use of environmental chemicals,
- g" P2 X# K. M' g( Ran attempt was made to establish the normal stretched
3 a1 @" c- X/ _penile length as well as the prevalence of male genital
. b0 W! u* D1 z4 S) banomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an2 `$ c. V0 G5 V. H
influence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs0 l0 O3 _; w! {# E0 e
on these parameters.3 \6 a3 c- L  ]: v2 x- ^* S
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
9 }( k' G+ B$ l* H" I, ?Authenticated
6 n5 ]' ?. e8 G$ iDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM: i# k: `" L3 o; r: m
510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
1 B# o6 y7 s% ]Subjects and methods6 ~0 p& S" h* B' ]" @% d
Study population
" ]. j* [% O: ~1 d% y' V$ v' K6 _The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-
/ z9 V) J$ i) b% S# f) z! Wsity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000& ^% c$ k6 j9 H0 K7 j1 [5 u
male full-term newborns was studied.8 v$ L' ?, Z7 d  c- R. S& k
Sampling technique$ s: F$ |) N& L, d: y) w) C) P2 e
Three days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each: G5 f! @  v/ }2 z) p$ Q9 Y2 ?
day, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
$ |% b- Y, D8 i" M9 R6 gstudy (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
* a. K( Y$ \6 h- aStatistical analysis
& ^' V4 y6 b8 q2 Q! NThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,! [8 W- v9 c6 B& Q& P9 R7 l9 ]6 P4 V) a
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
5 D+ G$ y8 U  T! C" |3 h8 vvariables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-
, R3 j6 F; v- h; k+ S; H& r& lables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for
; \! z* b9 e1 M( I. Fnormally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
$ |4 j, h3 n% L4 `* E1 L, mdone using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-! q# o% @) p( Z/ T1 p) y5 k7 H
tributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of
: e# _# ]2 h* P% d3 y% f6 Mqualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test3 X# `2 ~; i; F* G0 o! H
was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-! b1 d# l. q3 Z
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a3 z/ |3 o% T% ?3 i, X0 K. u; f: u$ s
probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .
# Y6 F) X; m+ t& u, j& h, nResults
/ a4 t, _: N" A" VData collected
+ g! J+ u6 A$ o, _2 UA researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
7 p( e! |- G- Xviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information4 |3 k2 X; V5 F7 o- W3 e$ `( [5 i
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
5 m4 @  }; R0 i' D5 eparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
" K7 K$ X  h  e; K/ Qfrequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during
: n  f% ~. S) u( i3 `. Opregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history* l& R4 G! ^9 H. f: e0 d
of hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-8 K( H$ R6 U) f+ W) o
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,0 ~& `2 e+ |% \% K0 n# {6 N
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-4 \) k9 X0 |% w6 [3 Z! C, y' c
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs
* D- ^8 D, {( o4 c2 i$ ugiven).# x  c% h( V4 t4 Q
Environmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-5 N5 P2 M# I" P# V5 Q
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed* v! a4 f2 H+ m6 k1 c7 A
into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having
" F1 }0 Q" u5 N3 w( bendocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-1 W1 j# |3 K) {& ~0 j5 L
ruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of3 x4 ^' G' T5 B4 f' M4 P& l# }9 S
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .+ |* s4 i" {9 v! F8 t
Descriptive data
2 Y- p6 B  E2 m. U5 T- r1 i9 q8 mThe mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
$ i1 x) y' K* t8 I2 w: A20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range5 F( l- A1 r; Z; g/ }
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-7 W8 `8 h3 z2 M/ B
nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-
& {! q- ~2 _3 a1 r1 c$ R  Ving therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers
( p( r  c. H" n7 m" ?(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,) F  H( O) w% C) K
6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-( }* S  t. W; }; }
acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )! B' C) S+ e5 e/ `
received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
- r. j  N2 |/ u5 X3 awhile the rest did not receive any medications during- Q3 u7 W2 P" o& K
pregnancy except for the known multivitamins and
- o! O% T2 `/ h+ `2 L+ J8 dcalcium supplementations. In addition, family history
0 {' Q7 J6 [# f. rof newborns born small for gestational age was positive: E8 U/ p, G$ L1 J+ O1 C
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).0 P3 q+ `" t$ ]. \
Examination: [8 K% @, D5 N0 k3 v
In addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy
4 a" i; _7 R8 A1 W. l/ ~+ Lwas examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the7 Q2 `! I, e, @$ M: a0 r
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination! Z# v4 ?- {1 M8 d
of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
5 O: Y2 ]3 _/ ~3 L3 F+ mlength (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital
6 G/ A9 j: M: y% p5 g4 Xanomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-3 F! z* y7 F$ u% O: O* S# c9 g
dias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-
" s2 M8 K0 T4 }8 z3 V' ntal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-
+ ?' P* d8 t- w& u( L8 {lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included: y; V7 j: T& y! @* a8 `5 E
as cases.
& |0 T8 q1 [; L1 X) MPenile length
! U; N" v  F3 `) e  D/ yLaboratory investigations
( Q) V. E) [+ w( d. LFree testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-3 S7 {$ h  k6 f8 w" u
nates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-
9 O/ Q% H2 i: z- D0 Vmunoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,5 D! l! t7 Q3 r6 Y% J
Dorchester, Ontario, Canada).# Q3 K2 i3 B, h
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
+ h# [9 D- |9 W8 eA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the& C, q  g1 P# P$ D* _! |
mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to
3 @# N; M' U' w6 z7 Phave micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)& t4 x: ]( r, Y+ E
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the5 L3 \! w+ N4 w- @
non-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).. N8 l8 B( }1 e# N$ r6 z  a3 A3 a  {
There was a linear relationship between penile length, F7 s) ?7 d9 l' ^7 H2 G
and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
0 @! J, X5 S' _$ J2 p: y$ Lficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there
0 M" E) X$ Z! S* x) R+ `- Gwas an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length: I- }* L% I: _2 W- p' R8 J6 u
(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between
# U6 \$ ]/ U3 M6 E$ _# B0 F+ kpenile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-: C5 H  k& b7 B( Z+ t1 y) [
sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,
& o# A- o0 i  |1 ^3 Athere was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in
, o- n! D$ T4 a/ L& ?/ v0 Cweight (kg).
. ?  ^& |6 h: F0 `+ Y& d; L+ EBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
- j" P, {- j- Y8 f0 ~; PAuthenticated
; Y8 P! F. c- E; b: KDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM* X4 |- o2 f0 ?5 Z' c5 e
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511( K; W7 n4 `/ i( Y1 X! ^7 d
3.459 o1 o" v: k& p# M. x9 b
3.40& |8 T# j6 _& u# g: u6 ]$ I, w* n. J1 e
3.35
+ V, s. |% V# z9 `, z' z3.30
# ?! N# t/ `1 }* r3.25/ |8 d0 Q( r' s* t
3.206 n3 S! n9 q  `2 v9 J7 K
3.152 {! ?* m; N  x" q+ G; }6 f; n: O( M# n
3.10+ {' E8 A7 x6 K! n
3.05
: c3 u4 w! T: o9 B( Z5 x% v3.005 A, {% c  L" R- e$ ?
2.95
6 d: n2 ~8 ^3 d% E; Z9 q2.90
9 z9 w, w3 l1 m/ ^7 x8 Q7 lMean
2 I  u, J; V$ c1 z( t- `penile9 m: c- f4 I  t5 R7 k
length
- Z7 c. e7 {3 W6 San odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons2 ]$ d& n  X3 i
were six times more likely to develop anomalies than
+ {9 I. [  e2 L# K1 N, z  cthose not exposed (Table 1 ).3 }, v' \/ \% i& ^$ A- g/ `# b
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring. p" V+ T, a3 t* t3 ^
of those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),
' b! m& _! T5 ]: u# V# lphthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In) d/ K6 M- m. u: Y/ m# W  m+ y
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had2 {: C2 b" @) X" Q* Z
genital anomalies (Table 2 ).) W2 T+ }& n3 ^# v5 y8 T: B
Exposed
" H8 s2 p5 [/ I6 }# \& ]( pNon exposed
1 J* L0 T; R3 C! N8 oPenile lengths according to exposure to endocrine" [1 s. b* o) j8 Z7 Q0 \3 L
Figure 1 disruptors.. `4 S7 S  y# N# c3 i" b0 V6 }, M
Serum free testosterone levels
, P  j) D- H. f" s1 c8 UExposure to cigarette smoke and progestins
9 ~' T" E4 y5 }/ p2 gduring the first trimester3 e* |% O7 b4 w1 R
None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;) Y# \# y3 w- v9 X3 [. V$ S& n& `
350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There
$ A- S% d+ g; U- Q: ~8 swas no difference between rates of anomalies among. P6 i1 k$ S7 V" G( x6 H: O
those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those
9 J3 ^1 e+ s3 C# r6 ?3 T: r4 Vnot exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-
; O6 ?' e- E# @' a) Z3 e' pence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed
" q( g2 l8 {3 C6 \1 t4 _to progestins during the first trimester when compared to/ L8 h6 ~5 ^! ~9 k* V- O' }
the non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % )./ m4 j8 ^# M5 ^* Z: r
In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
/ X+ e) |: m2 Q3 m) V' [# Jranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;! N3 B3 j2 q' ?
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship. y1 X( B. n& Q% p
between penile length and testosterone level of the/ C# X5 z& C3 n& w* s. i
newborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI
5 ~& i1 M4 r4 J7 n0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
/ O8 i% y, W  ~$ ]6 y) L5 Xin penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone! a* V& W; T4 ?6 O; u
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly# [% q4 E9 w6 o" Z+ K
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
7 {1 F/ m% h: @5 _# j/ v% Bthan in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;9 V- s% c' `* y7 |9 U2 F
p < 0.01).
2 D: q% [& |' N/ U2 f. }Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of. Q% h# n( B5 c) @5 F
exposure to endocrine disruptors., r# {" u; l0 `  |9 d: W
Exposure to endocrine+ n, x1 C$ Y; i" j* p
disruptors
6 Z$ U1 I  b0 b4 h! E' T4 sPrevalence of genital anomalies
; g4 u3 U* |' `Anomalies Total
3 k+ _+ r1 l6 W  n4 m) BNegative Positive. f" I" h0 X' x# N- E1 O% d
Negative exposure 908 11 919
( E) m6 e7 t- F- M. `: Y98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
. S) W9 X, l  w. WPositive exposure 75 6 81
  A+ g* v2 H7 k& F1 b92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %1 l/ B* ]2 E- H
Total 983 17 1000
; _. T. L$ f& X7 k98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %( R7 @; t4 ]0 x+ c5 t2 f# i
χ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.. [7 J5 C2 K% w$ v
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
! X+ H# F2 {6 N, P1 ?2 w% \. Ganomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
  I# k2 F& ?, `$ v; ^  Caccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-
  n# [0 H& M; z! ]! D! ~+ A2 d9 Ular hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One+ m3 i3 T4 o6 W0 t$ k( D
had penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-
# @! b* `& D: msided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.
$ V9 v' Z' f* o# M( r4 QExposure to EDCs
! ]/ P# ^& p# }# F; r+ z+ oAmong the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were9 ~" e4 o* m; ^; P& r
exposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from
! f7 r: p5 A$ k" j+ F2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from$ v( u4 p5 }$ ~+ U. X/ q
weekly to 2 – 3 months per year.
; v) B- W0 b- s$ ?4 u  ^There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies
" f3 `1 v) E/ ^; S. Wamong those who were exposed to EDs when compared+ s8 C  y& j3 {' v3 w) ]  Z
to non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with
' V+ p0 M7 ?2 t  rTable 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
' O% ?# d0 j4 i3 |the group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81)./ C% j1 }4 ^6 m
Anomalies Total" S1 o5 i6 ^. p$ r8 l7 ]
Negative Positive2 f  |5 S$ Q7 S
Chlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 213 S# Z' R# M. Q* j8 g! \
90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %' O# a, Q4 i* [, [+ E+ F
Heavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
/ e9 f9 ?- ?: Z" z: W, ~6 m2 ^93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %5 r! `3 U9 u; |" r  K/ D* h
Phthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23) ]2 U+ G7 y! T6 S" Y" E% T
91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %
* _5 g! Q; s! d* H7 C$ p% _! J! DPhenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5; V! O4 C2 Y* S
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %, z: l. u$ p1 Z# h+ A, L- }# w
Total 75 6 81
( C0 D/ L+ i; Y- j3 p6 I92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %
* r! b8 f5 b7 e* S# oBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco  ~( ~5 R1 {% m! k. J* x9 y
Authenticated
- _' a# u- W  j4 DDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
3 j' @* M: R8 |, k. |512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
1 X8 K& z9 d; B+ d+ N0 TDiscussion
: T! B; X- ?  w% }7 m9 oPreviously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm( ^" U! I& [8 O, h. `$ _
(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ,  `& `: L# k2 O- m
mean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly1 X+ ?4 I/ G5 c! P  \: I
higher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower
  \4 w6 E1 ]  j( w& q* {limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
0 K5 U4 @' [  ~) qour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-
' `$ l2 D& I5 u. `% ]ing the normal values for each country because the normal
( s* b! @& p& a( crange could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,' q6 K" q/ z6 r* _9 U
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of, q  R8 ^# N. Q$ E0 |" E0 Q$ D
micropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,/ h1 L* q  l5 Y( k- r% n
East-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).: K* ], h: ?: {9 N6 i/ }
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
  [' F! G0 d  M3 t8 \5 c* K, La penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest2 ?7 A6 P" t+ V4 A, P
limit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
; p& n8 J6 A% |6 `* Pof micropenis is important, because it might be the only
6 L0 G8 Q7 m7 K* ~$ l( L9 R6 Nobvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-6 b) n/ H8 U1 }) W  Z
monal deficiencies (17) .
* j- f1 ?) k. ~. K( d) WThe timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
3 j- ]1 d$ D5 \6 o! }5 Nborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
$ `* f7 g2 t' v1 oweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level) W- }8 M9 T3 c' ~# ?' U+ Y; N
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a! @0 t5 b0 f' r% E0 H1 H
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
7 x  ?) p: r3 l( b+ Umake sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
$ C1 U* a" f) ]& X0 Q5 i2 C8 jwere discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a
: Z' y' f: a  z' Xlinear relationship between penile length and testosterone: F" ^0 v! p: z2 u5 |2 y& @
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-
, i! B2 }6 |7 v$ v2 n* q' a) Q' @nates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group," q. y7 v: O0 m
which could be related to the lower testosterone levels in
! g0 X. Z) o, ^$ }, i1 I; Pthe exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis8 ?  J/ S% m  d
syndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or- G) z6 A( S  U* g) _! `
environmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies. I) t2 }3 J7 _, N0 i! ?3 \3 F- T! N
have found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-2 u7 N: j; K9 p, B
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .6 Y" q0 _. o6 Y& l' n$ y; Q
Some reports have suggested an increase in hypo-, V% }' d  \: Y6 i, @- B: f
spadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European) Z3 {+ d" Y+ E0 K, X. w! t
and US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical
6 v" y; |0 c0 bdifferences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from: Q, s: `9 |' f% B! t; `
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations( K* E# Y  m0 H/ {+ X) V. ]' m
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-
( ^% G& x( v+ z7 e- L9 u9 p) sgraphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
- Z) Z! S6 g6 t& [5 zcritically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,* J0 |& [; A# ~- {
increased exposure to environmental factors affecting4 E; q# \+ z# x, ?0 _/ {, U
androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with, H0 ]* ?) m: v3 O
estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause
& ?" F3 o. B% ]& R# h& ~, Zhypospadias (3, 4) .
9 q0 x) K  k! C* u$ uIn Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-
! K$ B. ?5 g0 D' a+ pspadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.
3 x. l$ _  i, Z7 qWhen applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average$ q5 U6 h' j) J: \1 ?4 j
prevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per. }# `. u$ t2 Y! H8 i, F
10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased" Y( ]+ x# L/ P8 ?6 s3 _+ S' N
significantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The
4 b7 H/ M  ?( J. Kprevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
0 Y+ N! s# G$ J( G/ mat 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the$ X" [# ?% q3 u( H7 r. @% |7 j- ]
prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
" Q' s  S& [  q8 o3 ~* ?( y4 OWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns$ G  r' O* o6 F. M& t) M
exposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
5 N4 z; s# C; y; D( ]+ M$ {% ^(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental" K5 h5 b8 n( X8 S! G/ ~0 C
pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.
, \/ I9 v; p" \3 F. f) }  EWithin the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
5 T. C# q+ w( n2 L! u- ^have suggested environmental factors as a possible cause
4 B: @/ B7 {# V5 P& ?# V! R, hfor the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in$ r: O' ~3 p- B/ s5 a) ?( h
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/7 ]# x3 _& B; J+ a+ a
occupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy
5 s/ f0 c2 _: z+ [, m% mindicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for
. G$ ?, T1 i- f1 F( c" G1 p4 tthe development of male external genital malformation$ S" f+ H; U2 M3 \) t, A: ]
(27 – 29) .0 u  Z( {- k4 P- l% F
Received October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
5 b/ _8 d8 g# k6 U9 epublished online March 18, 2013
% G5 s& {% u. H& W) u. x5 v6 CReferences; ?# w( w  p- i" T
1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J7 ~# R. R, s& k1 Y
Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.
/ }9 D" E& l9 I; S% P2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
1 w. |8 \) D; |+ w6 ?. N2 qpometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
4 g" _& y  Q' |; C( F8 ~5 Q/ o2007;83:441 – 6.6 v& d& `9 n, N  O4 D0 z/ V& H
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.4 Q! ]6 t  b" L( v7 L
Environmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of
; S  a8 [. b' d$ L4 A( Fmale sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:! f8 z# j2 {" d9 E- R+ i7 H
99 – 105.1 N, J  m# k% S6 _1 c8 H
4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling
6 g3 @$ b7 X* b# }3 Asperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?
/ v+ Z* k* z$ i1 hLancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.0 o4 s% k1 `% `, M
5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new8 Q; X# r5 P2 N! W2 n
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:
( \0 _" K1 U4 L1 o+ W/ B7 ~633 – 41.3 C! _6 Z' f; J$ a; ~
6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.; g1 F1 D6 m+ p3 g: |/ K
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic  g: p; T/ h9 h6 Z
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.+ `2 \% ?9 d! a* W5 U2 _
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a5 x, s3 R9 R5 ?  o" @
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,
, b0 [" D: a6 a' ^8 d2 PUK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on. v" o6 o1 f- t) D6 c1 u
March 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.. b, _! E& a$ Q* u# i
8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary6 d* A$ D. O! F0 O! q; C
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.5 }# D/ E. b. m$ T0 ~  V3 d
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
, @2 l1 d' j  b. p2 y+ mAuthenticated
+ k7 Y: j" e" v; r* u$ m2 PDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM: d: D. M! F7 M% E
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513
" L- P6 T8 E3 @7 e' H21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.2 }: f/ ?2 S% H2 [$ }. D
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.5 |* h- q8 k: z. w0 \
Acta Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.6 x$ O( `" f( Q4 S6 I) |
22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two3 U# P$ u' _& ]$ K7 {
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
. {1 ?6 Y7 j; Q; V- L8 xpenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.
( p& u% A% I6 a& [' eJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.* h3 k' f+ U) M3 ?! e  {
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.
$ y7 Y- M8 H" f: p/ u. mGenital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J7 [* u2 o3 r7 `+ u5 ?' A! Q2 v% w
9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at
  [' X+ i( Y0 r- b1 J; ?, B5 hbirth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
" P8 \) |4 C& t8 h: T, X10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health. e* \$ p$ q6 m
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.+ \$ \# ~: S" }% z. r6 c6 h
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:' ~9 O. r; X5 Y3 q( A
penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.$ s5 U6 v# Y: \3 L
12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring: ^( {- @7 K; g' w
13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term- M6 H7 z1 g) J2 D! a
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.5 L0 |' E2 J$ L6 @$ q9 u
14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.  J7 b& ^" h, g
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.
+ b  R! [. \6 k) z+ m1 H# z7 H16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.
3 ~9 u, J5 P! L- RPostnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum  h4 s5 G5 W. @' ^) M
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.5 \. x* t% D8 D( j) L* u
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
) t& U" I, q% h, G. v9 C17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,  M3 H! m& y# _' k6 v
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study( m  ?6 A' I; l0 T6 v+ T0 y
of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology3 _! w+ v6 ?- M+ v( x0 x+ a( m
2007;70:572 – 5.
& A: S0 Q; ~: F( e3 i18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular
: `! ?+ V' x8 j. E* Adysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.
* g' \8 A+ w4 N+ R5 oBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.- X2 G- }( U' @" ?3 n
19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male$ K0 R- J3 o: f/ h$ Y4 W( y0 Y
external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.
2 P1 V: R2 }: C; ~: h20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external+ L: j9 _" Z* K/ w
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.& L) B! a8 ?$ }3 d8 @2 K) Z
23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias" V- f) K9 C, N# n& n+ p/ ^* V7 j. p
and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:4 l9 M4 A+ [4 |. }
297 – 302.  M4 K" s& t' S" x& ?
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of5 P$ w: x' ~5 ^9 [7 F9 H4 k
surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
4 ~, N& B7 ]# {2 o! dBrussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis
; a5 b+ S) r  e; S+ `( i( O6 rPasteur, 1997.
3 G0 G7 ^4 }' L8 `  j25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence' @% W7 k7 o) F; v" n
of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological# j& J$ p) {2 K1 |% X$ {& k4 ~
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update# w5 U, k. x4 b; V* _
2001;7:282 – 6.8 v- C8 g( Q8 @
26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of1 |) E" @& P3 e9 X
hypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child. p/ \/ w* [6 `1 d; C
2007;92:580 – 4.
) j' |7 w9 S: o/ N  O6 m27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital# F& g  R8 c- v% C" O
development, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.# R' Q$ u1 R3 ^
28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen0 U) w9 u7 Z7 H7 D( Y
C, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
) |. a, V4 j, j7 U& g. V* g" qendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-; j( j% h% [* w9 q, M1 B3 ]
mations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
. t, M1 Q* Z/ j" d9 K6 HEnviron Health 2011;10:3.
* r. S7 g$ R- o! z% B29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High
- m0 _& q9 l9 ~0 d! [prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an
8 U  L+ Y$ P" L  d$ B/ H% C7 Yintensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl; ?1 @  k# N2 u( ?
2012;35:253 – 64.
累計簽到:5 天
連續簽到:1 天
發表於 2025-1-4 03:05:44 | 顯示全部樓層
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
RESPONSE OF MICROPENIS TO TOPICAL TESTOSTERONE AND& b9 V6 e5 ]7 d0 ?) g
GONADOTROPIN; H  J) B8 ^0 y3 `
RICHARD C. KLUGO* AND JOSEPH C. CERNY
. q$ a) B; s! z; o; m' Y9 h  ZFrom the Division of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan# p# m' E  F* |2 u5 ?$ ^- u
ABSTRACT
3 k- W  V& o- T  c" cFive patients were treated with gonadotropin and topical testosterone for micropenis associated" x, L. ^; S3 K
with hypothalamic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. All patients received 1,000 units of gonado-9 m2 I9 h/ M4 m& }7 K
tropin weekly for 3 weeks, with a 6-week interval followed by 10 per cent topical testosterone; D5 U1 T  F3 @1 h5 k) T# `
cream twice daily for 3 weeks. Serum testosterone levels were measured and remained equivalent- @9 Q+ e2 l9 V  w2 U+ L
for both modes of therapy. Average penile growth response with gonadotropin was 14.3 per cent  c; }3 Y) r0 U# I9 S% Q
increase in length and 5.0 per cent increase of girth. Topical testosterone produced an average
3 j- j% X! B+ Q2 Z  nincrease of 60 per cent in penile length and 52. 9 per cent in girth. The greatest growth response
/ s4 A% E/ a. T1 ]occurred in prepuberal male subjects with a minimal response in postpuberal male subjects. This* G* b6 h/ [6 L$ w1 l& r: \
study suggests that 10 per cent topical testosterone cream twice daily will produce effective penile6 p' W) Z* l! S/ L' Z
growth. The response appears to be greater in younger children, which is consistent with previ-
- M2 M7 n, M$ C* H$ aously published studies of age-related 5 reductase activity.
) R; O8 ~& r* |  Z- X7 W" @, }4 |) UChildren with microphallus regardless of its etiology will5 A1 g: l8 x1 P* z2 Q/ D0 o% q
require augmentation or consideration for alteration of exter-
) s) z) s2 O4 c6 D9 X# Enal genitalia. In many instances urethroplasty for hypo-( ^& D" X0 l* U% l1 Q
spadias is easier with previous stimulation of phallic growth.7 ]# X, q$ b0 @% U
The use of testosterone administered parenterally or topically$ W3 b2 g, Z1 Q) U4 T5 c
has produced effective phallic growth. 1- 3 The mechanism of# H  W1 q# L$ g; b! A# R& w: \- n8 o$ A
response has been considered as local or systemic. With this" p+ J) W; x. c$ l  k0 A- J! h
in mind we studied 5 children with microphallus for response( Z( G1 n4 f6 h: G5 @1 i
to gonadotropin and to topical testosterone independently.( X3 A  h4 I. ~
MATERIALS AND METHODS
( _; X; e, a. G  aFive 46 XY male subjects between 3 and 17 years old were' z/ Q; e: K5 {4 M. K
evaluated for serum testosterone levels and hypothalamic
" P# a* M# W7 ~" a/ Y. rfunction. Of these 5 boys 2 were considered to have Kallmann's* T$ \+ M2 j4 K
syndrome, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome and 2 idiopathic hypotha-8 I% g/ b; D% y; ~. V
lamic deficiency. After evaluation of response to luteinizing
5 \# e0 H# G0 `5 J' lhormone-releasing hormone these patients were treated with
1 z( [0 p$ s% o& G3 N$ c0 w1,000 units of gonadotropin weekly for 3 weeks. Six weeks
# c; c/ J4 ]( jafter completion of gonadotropin therapy 10 per cent topical$ G" E" ?9 A" B  `: q( ^
testosterone was applied to the phallus twice daily for 3 weeks.5 c, O3 U! \1 m% C
Serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulat-
, ~; H  Z0 u# n) s5 J, ring hormone were monitored before, during and after comple-
& B' c8 Z; y: D4 ytion of each phase of therapy. Penile stretch length was
3 s5 c4 m/ J9 A! m" fobtained by measuring from the symphysis pubis to the tip of
  X7 f: E* X7 v1 P7 T) a" i% C' Qthe glans. Penile circumferential (girth) measurements were
3 X& R( M6 h! T* fobtained using an orthopedic digital measuring device (see, O: [( P4 K' S5 B) g! e# w+ E
figure).
1 `1 O5 `5 b0 {$ z- }. h; E& p% F& gRESULTS
1 `4 y* ]6 V8 E8 ^; f' }Serum testosterone increased moderately to levels between
* ?- S% K, l  v" O2 ~9 e50 and 86 ng./dl. with gonadotropin stimulation. Serum testos-
1 G6 ~/ n% ~+ N& ^4 b# ]terone levels with topical testosterone remained near pre-+ i) k5 ?% X0 ^& ]/ y4 [
treatment levels (35 ng./dl.) or were elevated to similar levels
- _9 K: j- l% n9 m% D8 T- L0 Ydeveloped after gonadotropin therapy (96 ng./dl.). Higher& j& e. ^. ~/ e3 K8 |
serum levels were noted in older patients (12 and 17 years old),
/ ~0 i1 D! d* E" Iwhile lower levels persisted in younger patients (4, 8, and 104 b; d; j4 X& D! G; D( u6 ~) B
years old) (see table). Despite absence of profound alterations
4 X% W8 C* K, ?" n. `of serum testosterone the topical therapy provided a greater% q* y. J9 ?( x. _* q7 ~
Accepted for publication July 1, 1977. ·8 E+ K1 z/ D6 {! z7 U
Read at annual meeting of American Urological Association,
$ I' K; G$ K& ^( |Chicago, Illinois, April 24-28, 1977.  E6 z( Q* @. C- g
* Requests for reprints: Division of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital,: M* E# H' \$ i& z3 ]7 c2 i. ]) }
2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan 48202.3 J* i' t  R3 l/ D' f
improvement in phallic growth compared to gonadotropin.
* b0 A7 N% [) L: o2 r0 G, ]Average phallic growth with gonadotropin was 14.3 per cent  f* j$ @/ o- z( z4 X
increase in length and 5.0 per cent increase of girth. Topical  J% z% |) d1 ?; s
testosterone produced a 60.0 per cent increase of phallic length
% m+ _$ [1 v) L# band 52.9 per cent increase of girth (circumference). The9 P7 p2 j5 o2 a6 F( f
response to topical testosterone was greatest in children be-
4 q7 z  a1 w: Z& r! w7 ttween 4 and 8 years old, with a gradual decrease to age 17: L+ Q% \+ v- q9 ?8 i
years (see table).) F5 \6 j' i) f# M# _. [; X
DISCUSSION8 C# B5 Y. z7 |. a4 Y7 P8 t2 q
Topical testosterone has been used effectively by other, i# C/ j$ b/ n  `
clinicians but its mode of action remains controversial. Im-; I! b/ h0 q2 i! d
mergut and associates reported an excellent growth response
; T4 ?, H' C9 T4 Y- Q; mto topical testosterone with low levels of serum testosterone,
1 g4 Q4 a9 }- [# e$ Zsuggesting a local effect.1 Others have obtained growth re-
! j4 l( F# A  P, w$ T+ Bsponse with high. levels of serum testosterone after topical
. P1 `& a) s$ v5 e0 s6 D4 D( fadministration, suggesting a systemic response. 3 The use of
, c1 [. a- T( U9 `' ~6 ~gonadotropin to obtain levels of serum testosterone compara-
! }/ S: h4 j1 l9 r! _6 Fble to levels obtained with topical testosterone would seem to
! h1 k& D; ^; C) ]provide a means to compare the relative effectiveness of
! x$ S- K1 Q# ktopical testosterone to systemic testosterone effect. It cer-3 Q: h+ `  c! X2 k5 V. E" ^2 P
tainly has been established that gonadotropin as well as par-$ |* D# ~' o1 C5 B
enteral testosterone administration will produce genital
; r8 \0 N7 M$ @growth. Our report shows that the growth of the phallus was
# _: ^+ h$ R1 O3 Gsignificantly greater with topical applications than with go-" H$ f6 x2 z$ R
nadotropin, particularly in children less than 10 years old.7 B$ p& P4 i7 e6 G; x$ F. |
The levels of serum testosterone remained similar or lower' |- e- T5 ^& d" P* e4 K
than with gonadotropin during therapy, suggesting that topi-% S9 ]2 G& p( ^5 \- B$ g: R3 t4 E
cal application produces genital growth by its local effect as
5 X. ?+ W. q+ \8 y3 P, E" mwell as its systemic effect.
8 l2 P. J! `7 d6 nReview of our patients and their growth response related to
& f4 D7 _8 B$ ^age shows a greater growth response at an earlier age. This is
  B+ N! }0 ]# k) W6 b& ]consistent with the findings of Wilson and Walker, who
; U% q0 n6 y# m, h% \$ Freported an increased conversion of testosterone to dihydrotes-4 X6 Q; Y6 e/ [$ C# v
tosterone in the foreskin of neonates and infants.4 This activ-7 n% t6 r# N9 k8 w. j
ity gradually decreases with age until puberty when it ap-! _% K) i' n5 ]4 i* V3 m
proaches the same level of activity as peripheral skin. It may$ A' \2 j) J0 v7 g
well be that absorption of testosterone is less when applied at" E4 Z" i( f. i1 a: D& Q
an earlier age as suggested by lower serum levels in children# p& E$ m$ `9 ?$ _5 A/ \' J: b
less than 10 years old. This fact may be explained by the; ]; F* L2 l5 d. S4 _3 h) B
greater ability of phallic skin to convert testosterone to dihy-" k( L. F- }+ K$ W- B8 @# x: C5 v( a
drotestosterone at this age. Conversely, serum levels in older! ^4 t* o; t) `* D& J
patients were higher, possibly because of decreased local
' }' d# o' j/ M6 u, B& c) |: l667
' Q8 y) P& w" k, p668 KLUGO AND CERNY
: T9 N9 n. H$ E. F+ |) ePt. Age6 x1 y6 M6 [2 {3 L/ `5 \
(yrs.)* @% U' B" ^4 K3 E) ~" F& |9 d
Serum Testosterone Phallus (cm.) Change Length
* g4 y! s3 v3 q- r1 M5 l(ng./dl.) Girth x Length (%)9 E# Q  {6 @4 D/ @% V- z" F+ Q6 a
4% K  Z% {! u6 M0 V$ Q5 [3 L! g7 F
8
( O+ @' p& M1 M' p. n10( A. ?) l+ X7 o7 u
12) d3 L: x2 y# h  t9 R1 F
17
- Z' D( ?1 n! T8 H  T0 `; ^Gonadotropin
. u/ q0 I0 N7 l7 l1 ^7 F71.6 2.0 X 3 16.6
: Z& J# P, q' m7 ^$ A50.4 4.0 X 5.0 20.0
- a2 V+ Z4 j9 |, @4 q$ Y/ a& X22.0 4.5 X 4.0 25.0
) H& T7 S1 ?+ p' r84.6 4.0 X 4.5 11.1
' e+ h/ b2 m- p4 h85.9 4.5 X 5.5 9.07 E0 Z) [0 C$ o9 z& V8 ?
Av. 14.3
8 {  {: N- ^0 N# k3 i4
/ n6 s7 ]# \# m" u5 n8/ p1 v; R/ J7 f6 s5 c
10
* {7 f, k+ b5 C7 ^' K# T12
" l- V! J' ^' o* b17- D$ W0 x5 f$ k7 P, o
Topical testosterone
6 k, D! D* m2 x% z" o# k- ~5 N34.6 4.5 X 6.5 85
9 a- G4 F/ N* u& |9 T4 u38.8 6.0 X 8.5 70
) y- `: ^8 N7 U: u- T40.0 6.0 X 6.5 62.58 B+ d( b, e7 y3 R9 g4 a! }
93.6 6.0 X 7.0 55.59 r8 W$ v  F4 O* _( S: i
95.0 6.5 X 7.0 27.2$ `0 T& b5 s% g. M- Z+ p: f( ]
Av. 60.0
% k% w# h. v1 o! o+ Qavailable testosterone. Again, emphasis should be placed on
  P% Z; E0 i: E$ L6 y( ^early therapy when lower levels of testosterone appear to# A9 `8 e: T2 \* y8 F
provide the best responses. The earlier therapy is instituted2 A; y& q. x0 a3 j- G* l% {
the more likely there will be an excellent response with low
) ^) a# M" V& h8 p+ fserum levels. Response occurs throughout adolescence as5 v  _+ i  w3 m5 f# p5 H) U
noted in nomograms of phallic growth. 7 The actual response0 [0 S& A: N0 V; P8 _
to a given serum level of testosterone is much greater at birth: t; K- ^( D& C" p! S
and gradually decreases as boys reach puberty. This is most
# y( I  z) K3 v) v2 E% A1 v2 }likely related to the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotes-
9 [1 u8 ?2 ^2 t# ~) ?tosterone and correlates well with the studies of testosterone# k- y' W# C, U- x0 S
conversion in foreskin at various ages.
# [5 a8 e8 Y. S" x) X& y3 YThe question arises regarding early treatment as to whether; }: c5 V1 b! C- V
one might sacrifice ultimate potential growth as with acceler-, E  f2 r" F- ?8 [4 d, i
ated bone growth. The situation appears quite the reverse
/ b8 M! H, l7 ~5 i) W* F1 awith phallic response. If the early growth period is not used
* T: B3 C/ w5 d: D3 c. Awhen 5a reductase activity is greatest then potential growth9 |4 P2 Q" T8 x  H- G% v3 b
may be lost. We have not observed any regression of growth  ~4 C- C/ W3 y+ x2 F
attained with topical or gonadotropin therapy. It may well
9 [# }/ k9 T/ l3 _be that some patients will show little or no response to any8 P# U( ~( M: j  A
form of therapy. This would suggest a defect in the ability to
6 D5 G! h  a) ]* H" P. w0 H# Kconvert testosterone to dihydrotestosterone and indicate that0 |) t' o1 \: Q$ U! H, o. Q, a
phallic and peripheral skin, and subcutaneous tissue should
5 N# @1 d, J' r" r  d/ c5 Y8 ~be compared for 5a reductase activity./ d! E: [) Z& i
A, loop enlarges to measure penile girth in millimeters. B,
& e1 K0 K) ~3 N3 L( zexample of penile girth computed easily and accurately." H% c" w- }# E8 a2 h6 _- N
conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. It is in this" H8 H. e! k1 m. C; c
older group that others have noted high levels of serum
( G$ S5 Y9 v7 X- Q! Ptestosterone with topical application. It would also appear* z; n* w" o$ \/ |7 _
that phallic response during puberty is related directly to the% m' S% z1 `" F6 G" X
serum testosterone level. There also is other evidence of local: R& a6 }& z$ _3 S: f3 a1 k
response to testosterone with hair growth and with spermato-
6 \5 h3 c2 Z; }% V+ L; Y4 sgenesis. 5• 6
5 w3 }" U! [1 y! c" P( m+ mAdministration of larger doses of gonadotropin or systemic
$ l* S8 W. k1 e( W. stestosterone, as well as topical applications that produce; W! H7 z! p1 d) F' L
higher levels of serum testosterone (150 to 900 ng./dl.), will
* [% f- O2 k1 z  p7 `( r% l6 kalso produce phallic growth but risks accelerated skeletal
- D' I1 L# j' F# ematuration even after stopping treatment. It would appear
& d8 J% c9 M7 k, rthat this may be avoided by topical applications of testosterone7 l" {2 O$ m% L3 t5 ?
and monitoring of serum testosterone. Even with this control
! }+ R4 W' h# D0 h2 x$ Pthe duration of our therapy did not exceed 3 weeks at any
: D; S' g3 X" L2 E$ f" M1 Otime. It is apparent that the prepuberal male subject may0 Y! A  D8 A) D6 Y# i9 ~: d
suffer accelerated bone growth with testosterone levels near/ j# K; ?) n) }* D2 d, a
200 ng./dl. When skeletal maturation is complete the level of. D. _, P/ P' O
serum testosterone can be maintained in the 700 to 1,300 ng./
1 x& \7 T  r. u' \) Ldl. range to stimulate phallic growth and secondary sexual
3 p0 ?/ f  U0 M2 e. f9 Rchanges. Therefore, after skeletal maturation parenteral tes-% d2 d6 F% d1 v5 i- I
tosterone may be used to advantage. Before skeletal matura-+ P8 x  n0 E5 e! N% ]
tion care must be taken to avoid maintaining levels of serum# V# ?9 u" W0 r. R0 ^
testosterone more than 100 ng./dl. Low-dose gonadotropin
7 o2 K! o$ e7 X3 ~1 D5 z" Jdepends upon intrinsic testicular activity and may require7 K* n  l0 @6 J3 h
prolonged administration for any response.
& I/ ~# a( s% x7 J  Z5 `7 zAlternately, topical testosterone does not depend upon tes-; T/ q/ N6 G7 C! h+ z& t
ticular function and may provide a more constant level of: q$ a0 ]4 K7 T1 R. f. P
REFERENCES  ~$ h9 C+ Z; E/ o8 u: q$ n
1. Immergut, M., Boldus, R., Yannone, E., Bunge, R. and Flocks,
. |' `4 R  {& PR.: The local application of testosterone cream to the prepub-
% Y4 r5 I0 c* p" z0 \. P& Wertal phallus. J. Urol., 105: 905, 1971.
( }0 [9 T' x, _( [- t' l/ {$ F% L2. Guthrie, R. D., Smith, D. W. and Graham, C. B.: Testosterone
1 j4 b* ^9 v, S; W( }5 streatment for micropenis during early childhood. J. Pediat.,
  y2 U- J5 r# M# p, H8 D% T: M: R3 X83: 247, 1973.
) q: d/ x8 H7 Y+ p% |* ?3. Jacobs, S. C., Kaplan, G. W. and Gittes, R. F.: Topical testoster-
, t5 H4 Y7 z0 g( Tone therapy for penile growth. Urology, 6: 708, 1975.
) y9 q  u/ |! P# r& E4. Wilson, J. D. and Walker, J. D.: The conversion of testosterone# x! ~/ ^3 D6 J3 V: k/ B7 l
to 5 alpha-androstan-17 beta-01-3-one (dihydrotestosterone) by$ P! o/ q% N. {2 a
skin slices of man. J. Clin. Invest., 48: 371, 1969.
. q: V. l4 J0 w& R1 _8 p2 o5. Papa, C. M. and Klingman, A. M.: Stimulation of hair growth, e) \$ v6 m8 J; D2 ~
by topical application of androgens. J.A.M.A., 191: 521, 1965.
4 V7 ]. F% I/ d6. Gittes, R. F., Smith, G., Conn, C. A. and Smith, F.: Local' L# s' y* r  }. w$ M) K4 E) F
androgenic effect of interstitial cell tumor of the testis. J.
& j$ w7 G7 F- }: zUrol., 104: 774, 1970.. I; y! F5 P' M" Y1 x: Y* i+ z
7. Schonfeld, W. A. and Beebe, G. W.: Normal growth and varia-' K' v+ ?- v. w0 v
tion in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J. Urol., 48:
 分享同時學會感恩,一句感謝的話語,就是最大的支持!  歡迎交流討論
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即注册

本版積分規則


快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表