- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy
) \* m e) k( e) t! Z' rPenile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
( a4 O3 Z, x% [5 D# ^male newborns: epidemiology and influence of
+ N, c" q$ I) A9 v. R7 a, M3 s9 m; \endocrine disruptors
* b9 n# D. W' M' f; H& JAbstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal
: C, e$ s* F, U! V; \7 lstretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
7 l9 J/ ^9 H+ V- X* a6 D }tal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
: ]& H) T! [; q# m3 Q5 lare influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-6 ?5 t5 e( y7 l; k; b& e- O& q
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were- L, u4 r( P) C5 w
included; their mothers were subjected to the following
$ n: k/ Y/ h0 Z3 X5 iquestionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-' T' \* }" z6 D4 o* E
tact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure% w# L) o4 ]- P; U7 X) o
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
/ j* K+ B$ C3 g: Banomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro
; E( T- J) B- d9 X! w x8 Zfertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured9 o$ e! ?- {4 @1 {( K
in 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length
7 Q! z0 ]; |( I+ g4 j& Bwas 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered
- T: T6 s/ d! Z" g1 N% z8 Smicropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %5 T3 w h: I" F L/ Y, G" z
(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-3 ~* Y3 E) [; Z8 L
lies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )$ u ? j* h* f/ h1 ?+ U. D# ?
than in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,
7 {: g/ o# v$ n& f/ g95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed
" W! U7 i8 Z. H" A7 Pa linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower; u: B& L$ m8 W8 z4 u% ?. f* V
in neonates exposed to EDs.
4 r8 @5 T0 r, j& W" K3 n# EKeywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;
0 C0 x; K q) E5 Xpenile length; testosterone.2 J, g8 a. Y7 a) U: Z* S
*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of/ @. y5 [' P# H/ B6 l# A, b
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36
% s8 w0 D& h1 m, Q$ W9 KHisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo
$ l# ]; _- N3 b/ U# P11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ," c+ s& J3 l3 e9 p3 x% i7 c
E-mail: [email protected]2 v: ], Q3 o- U" t
Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of: W q- ]" V% y4 m
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
* J. Z; D4 V9 mEgypt2 d* I3 `, s# B
Introduction- I% _1 S0 u& a; \) s" v& p" e; e( {
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in! |3 h/ W6 O- a. t, F5 ^" m2 Z
the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
% A5 T" I& I$ a- j7 n$ p7 Eopment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
; \) o: n- \5 k7 n# rpenis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is
: g) `* k+ J% I5 x: W5 Rmore than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean+ r' }% ~( o/ ?
size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements
3 a- l. r' w6 Ncan be subject to significant international variations, in1 R4 _5 y! g' g+ W8 _
addition to being obtained with different methodologies
& A2 z p6 G$ ]8 K1 @0 M& y/ ain some cases (2) .6 q4 W" Y3 t! ~, d7 H- T+ }$ E* J
Over the past 20 years, the documented increase in
" |* _( a' b4 O! J; j8 hdisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
& c9 \: N. }' L) \8 l( {spadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the
/ _8 \' ^' f: `+ L. P$ Qsuspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental c. d/ h: f3 { b, F7 t) V$ Q
to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-8 i5 m8 h8 d5 g+ t* _1 T
called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible$ g: q# E, _. [/ U- r
common cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-
5 ~3 Q) |% i- N. q6 mmalities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to
5 b) {5 ]2 v; d$ g5 boestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
/ H h4 `4 H, ~' o2 ?of fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated7 R* X, e; N7 h" c2 I
developmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality
2 m Q Y' S7 _$ wof semen (4) .2 ]; l' W# d" x: N) i+ X' L
It has been proposed that these disorders are part of
7 D8 F- @: U* ?3 y0 ~9 ma single common underlying entity known as the testicu-2 \% L) L( z6 l6 d1 f
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various8 {- Z8 u# g8 s
aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,
2 \- Y" j/ C1 q8 ~' q9 {/ p* [including abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,
( z& V% A5 v3 ?* |/ Qhypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .
$ t. [$ ~( \/ x# XThe etiological basis for this condition is complex
% g% l. h. {; v0 k' |3 Qand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
5 V1 F/ L* L' s) Land environmental factors that result in the disruption4 m: Z( _; O8 K( ]/ r2 `8 Q% Y# F
of normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,5 A; _2 L4 j5 o) }
it was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-& H% x1 L+ R; k+ ?/ k6 v
trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male' K/ f# u, M. T7 e% c3 L, F3 u( G
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to/ s! _- y) \0 y! w! w' G N
include environmental chemicals with anti-androgen4 \9 L1 B1 w+ U0 n5 j+ v
actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between! z* h5 c) ]9 r
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by# d0 x$ s, O$ C/ K6 `' d* \
which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
8 x/ r q7 e5 `9 T1 Xresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive1 j4 J, u+ l$ k0 K, k* G
tract abnormalities (5) .
7 y. ~; T- h: H6 d0 V$ J. g# p7 RWith the increasing use of environmental chemicals,
- g" P2 X# K. M' g( Ran attempt was made to establish the normal stretched
3 a1 @" c- X/ _penile length as well as the prevalence of male genital
. b0 W! u* D1 z4 S) banomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an2 `$ c. V0 G5 V. H
influence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs0 l0 O3 _; w! {# E0 e
on these parameters.3 \6 a3 c- L ]: v2 x- ^* S
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
9 }( k' G+ B$ l* H" I, ?Authenticated
6 n5 ]' ?. e8 G$ iDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM: i# k: `" L3 o; r: m
510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
1 B# o6 y7 s% ]Subjects and methods6 ~0 p& S" h* B' ]" @% d
Study population
" ]. j* [% O: ~1 d% y' V$ v' K6 _The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-
/ z9 V) J$ i) b% S# f) z! Wsity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000& ^% c$ k6 j9 H0 K7 j1 [5 u
male full-term newborns was studied.8 v$ L' ?, Z7 d c- R. S& k
Sampling technique$ s: F$ |) N& L, d: y) w) C) P2 e
Three days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each: G5 f! @ v/ }2 z) p$ Q9 Y2 ?
day, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
$ |% b- Y, D8 i" M9 R6 gstudy (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
* a. K( Y$ \6 h- aStatistical analysis
& ^' V4 y6 b8 q2 Q! NThe computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,! [8 W- v9 c6 B& Q& P9 R7 l9 ]6 P4 V) a
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric
5 D+ G$ y8 U T! C" |3 h8 vvariables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-
, R3 j6 F; v- h; k+ S; H& r& lables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for
; \! z* b9 e1 M( I. Fnormally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
$ |4 j, h3 n% L4 `* E1 L, mdone using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-! q# o% @) p( Z/ T1 p) y5 k7 H
tributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of
: e# _# ]2 h* P% d3 y% f6 Mqualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test3 X# `2 ~; i; F* G0 o! H
was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-! b1 d# l. q3 Z
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a3 z/ |3 o% T% ?3 i, X0 K. u; f: u$ s
probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .
# Y6 F) X; m+ t& u, j& h, nResults
/ a4 t, _: N" A" VData collected
+ g! J+ u6 A$ o, _2 UA researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-
7 p( e! |- G- Xviews with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information4 |3 k2 X; V5 F7 o- W3 e$ `( [5 i
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
5 m4 @ }; R0 i' D5 eparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
" K7 K$ X h e; K/ Qfrequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during
: n f% ~. S) u( i3 `. Opregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history* l& R4 G! ^9 H. f: e0 d
of hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-8 K( H$ R6 U) f+ W) o
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,0 ~& `2 e+ |% \% K0 n# {6 N
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-4 \) k9 X0 |% w6 [3 Z! C, y' c
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs
* D- ^8 D, {( o4 c2 i$ ugiven).# x c% h( V4 t4 Q
Environmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-5 N5 P2 M# I" P# V5 Q
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed* v! a4 f2 H+ m6 k1 c7 A
into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having
" F1 }0 Q" u5 N3 w( bendocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-1 W1 j# |3 K) {& ~0 j5 L
ruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of3 x4 ^' G' T5 B4 f' M4 P& l# }9 S
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .+ |* s4 i" {9 v! F8 t
Descriptive data
2 Y- p6 B E2 m. U5 T- r1 i9 q8 mThe mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range
$ i1 x) y' K* t8 I2 w: A20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range5 F( l- A1 r; Z; g/ }
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-7 W8 `8 h3 z2 M/ B
nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-
& {! q- ~2 _3 a1 r1 c$ R Ving therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers
( p( r c. H" n7 m" ?(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,) F H( O) w% C) K
6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-( }* S t. W; }; }
acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )! B' C) S+ e5 e/ `
received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
- r. j N2 |/ u5 X3 awhile the rest did not receive any medications during- Q3 u7 W2 P" o& K
pregnancy except for the known multivitamins and
- o! O% T2 `/ h+ `2 L+ J8 dcalcium supplementations. In addition, family history
0 {' Q7 J6 [# f. rof newborns born small for gestational age was positive: E8 U/ p, G$ L1 J+ O1 C
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).0 P3 q+ `" t$ ]. \
Examination: [8 K% @, D5 N0 k3 v
In addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy
4 a" i; _7 R8 A1 W. l/ ~+ Lwas examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the7 Q2 `! I, e, @$ M: a0 r
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination! Z# v4 ?- {1 M8 d
of the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
5 O: Y2 ]3 _/ ~3 L3 F+ mlength (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital
6 G/ A9 j: M: y% p5 g4 Xanomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-3 F! z* y7 F$ u% O: O* S# c9 g
dias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-
" s2 M8 K0 T4 }8 z3 V' ntal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-
+ ?' P* d8 t- w& u( L8 {lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included: y; V7 j: T& y! @* a8 `5 E
as cases.
& |0 T8 q1 [; L1 X) MPenile length
! U; N" v F3 `) e D/ yLaboratory investigations
( Q) V. E) [+ w( d. LFree testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-3 S7 {$ h k6 f8 w" u
nates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-
9 O/ Q% H2 i: z- D0 Vmunoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,5 D! l! t7 Q3 r6 Y% J
Dorchester, Ontario, Canada).# Q3 K2 i3 B, h
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
+ h# [9 D- |9 W8 eA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the& C, q g1 P# P$ D* _! |
mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to
3 @# N; M' U' w6 z7 Phave micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)& t4 x: ]( r, Y+ E
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the5 L3 \! w+ N4 w- @
non-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).. N8 l8 B( }1 e# N$ r6 z a3 A3 a {
There was a linear relationship between penile length, F7 s) ?7 d9 l' ^7 H2 G
and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
0 @! J, X5 S' _$ J2 p: y$ Lficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there
0 M" E) X$ Z! S* x) R+ `- Gwas an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length: I- }* L% I: _2 W- p' R8 J6 u
(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between
# U6 \$ ]/ U3 M6 E$ _# B0 F+ kpenile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-: C5 H k& b7 B( Z+ t1 y) [
sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,
& o# A- o0 i |1 ^3 Athere was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in
, o- n! D$ T4 a/ L& ?/ v0 Cweight (kg).
. ? ^& |6 h: F0 `+ Y& d; L+ EBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
- j" P, {- j- Y8 f0 ~; PAuthenticated
; Y8 P! F. c- E; b: KDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM* X4 |- o2 f0 ?5 Z' c5 e
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511( K; W7 n4 `/ i( Y1 X! ^7 d
3.459 o1 o" v: k& p# M. x9 b
3.40& |8 T# j6 _& u# g: u6 ]$ I, w* n. J1 e
3.35
+ V, s. |% V# z9 `, z' z3.30
# ?! N# t/ `1 }* r3.25/ |8 d0 Q( r' s* t
3.206 n3 S! n9 q `2 v9 J7 K
3.152 {! ?* m; N x" q+ G; }6 f; n: O( M# n
3.10+ {' E8 A7 x6 K! n
3.05
: c3 u4 w! T: o9 B( Z5 x% v3.005 A, {% c L" R- e$ ?
2.95
6 d: n2 ~8 ^3 d% E; Z9 q2.90
9 z9 w, w3 l1 m/ ^7 x8 Q7 lMean
2 I u, J; V$ c1 z( t- `penile9 m: c- f4 I t5 R7 k
length
- Z7 c. e7 {3 W6 San odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons2 ]$ d& n X3 i
were six times more likely to develop anomalies than
+ {9 I. [ e2 L# K1 N, z cthose not exposed (Table 1 ).3 }, v' \/ \% i& ^$ A- g/ `# b
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring. p" V+ T, a3 t* t3 ^
of those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),
' b! m& _! T5 ]: u# V# lphthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In) d/ K6 M- m. u: Y/ m# W m+ y
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had2 {: C2 b" @) X" Q* Z
genital anomalies (Table 2 ).) W2 T+ }& n3 ^# v5 y8 T: B
Exposed
" H8 s2 p5 [/ I6 }# \& ]( pNon exposed
1 J* L0 T; R3 C! N8 oPenile lengths according to exposure to endocrine" [1 s. b* o) j8 Z7 Q0 \3 L
Figure 1 disruptors.. `4 S7 S y# N# c3 i" b0 V6 }, M
Serum free testosterone levels
, P j) D- H. f" s1 c8 UExposure to cigarette smoke and progestins
9 ~' T" E4 y5 }/ p2 gduring the first trimester3 e* |% O7 b4 w1 R
None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;) Y# \# y3 w- v9 X3 [. V$ S& n& `
350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There
$ A- S% d+ g; U- Q: ~8 swas no difference between rates of anomalies among. P6 i1 k$ S7 V" G( x6 H: O
those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those
9 J3 ^1 e+ s3 C# r6 ?3 T: r4 Vnot exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-
; O6 ?' e- E# @' a) Z3 e' pence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed
" q( g2 l8 {3 C6 \1 t4 _to progestins during the first trimester when compared to/ L8 h6 ~5 ^! ~9 k* V- O' }
the non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % )./ m4 j8 ^# M5 ^* Z: r
In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
/ X+ e) |: m2 Q3 m) V' [# Jranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;! N3 B3 j2 q' ?
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship. y1 X( B. n& Q% p
between penile length and testosterone level of the/ C# X5 z& C3 n& w* s. i
newborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI
5 ~& i1 M4 r4 J7 n0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
/ O8 i% y, W ~$ ]6 y) L5 Xin penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone! a* V& W; T4 ?6 O; u
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly# [% q4 E9 w6 o" Z+ K
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
7 {1 F/ m% h: @5 _# j/ v% Bthan in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;9 V- s% c' `* y7 |9 U2 F
p < 0.01).
2 D: q% [& |' N/ U2 f. }Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of. Q% h# n( B5 c) @5 F
exposure to endocrine disruptors., r# {" u; l0 ` |9 d: W
Exposure to endocrine+ n, x1 C$ Y; i" j* p
disruptors
6 Z$ U1 I b0 b4 h! E' T4 sPrevalence of genital anomalies
; g4 u3 U* |' `Anomalies Total
3 k+ _+ r1 l6 W n4 m) BNegative Positive. f" I" h0 X' x# N- E1 O% d
Negative exposure 908 11 919
( E) m6 e7 t- F- M. `: Y98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
. S) W9 X, l w. WPositive exposure 75 6 81
A+ g* v2 H7 k& F1 b92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %1 l/ B* ]2 E- H
Total 983 17 1000
; _. T. L$ f& X7 k98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %( R7 @; t4 ]0 x+ c5 t2 f# i
χ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.. [7 J5 C2 K% w$ v
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
! X+ H# F2 {6 N, P1 ?2 w% \. Ganomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
I# k2 F& ?, `$ v; ^ Caccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-
n# [0 H& M; z! ]! D! ~+ A2 d9 Ular hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One+ m3 i3 T4 o6 W0 t$ k( D
had penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-
# @! b* `& D: msided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.
$ V9 v' Z' f* o# M( r4 QExposure to EDCs
! ]/ P# ^& p# }# F; r+ z+ oAmong the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were9 ~" e4 o* m; ^; P& r
exposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from
! f7 r: p5 A$ k" j+ F2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from$ v( u4 p5 }$ ~+ U. X/ q
weekly to 2 – 3 months per year.
; v) B- W0 b- s$ ?4 u ^There was a significantly higher rate of anomalies
" f3 `1 v) E/ ^; S. Wamong those who were exposed to EDs when compared+ s8 C y& j3 {' v3 w) ] Z
to non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with
' V+ p0 M7 ?2 t rTable 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
' O% ?# d0 j4 i3 |the group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81)./ C% j1 }4 ^6 m
Anomalies Total" S1 o5 i6 ^. p$ r8 l7 ]
Negative Positive2 f |5 S$ Q7 S
Chlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 213 S# Z' R# M. Q* j8 g! \
90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %' O# a, Q4 i* [, [+ E+ F
Heavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
/ e9 f9 ?- ?: Z" z: W, ~6 m2 ^93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %5 r! `3 U9 u; |" r K/ D* h
Phthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23) ]2 U+ G7 y! T6 S" Y" E% T
91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %
* _5 g! Q; s! d* H7 C$ p% _! J! DPhenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5; V! O4 C2 Y* S
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %, z: l. u$ p1 Z# h+ A, L- }# w
Total 75 6 81
( C0 D/ L+ i; Y- j3 p6 I92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %
* r! b8 f5 b7 e* S# oBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco ~( ~5 R1 {% m! k. J* x9 y
Authenticated
- _' a# u- W j4 DDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
3 j' @* M: R8 |, k. |512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
1 X8 K& z9 d; B+ d+ N0 TDiscussion
: T! B; X- ? w% }7 m9 oPreviously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm( ^" U! I& [8 O, h. `$ _
(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) , `& `: L# k2 O- m
mean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly1 X+ ?4 I/ G5 c! P \: I
higher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower
\4 w6 E1 ] j( w& q* {limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
0 K5 U4 @' [ ~) qour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-
' `$ l2 D& I5 u. `% ]ing the normal values for each country because the normal
( s* b! @& p& a( crange could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,' q6 K" q/ z6 r* _9 U
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of, q R8 ^# N. Q$ E0 |" E0 Q$ D
micropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,/ h1 L* q l5 Y( k- r% n
East-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).: K* ], h: ?: {9 N6 i/ }
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
[' F! G0 d M3 t8 \5 c* K, La penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest2 ?7 A6 P" t+ V4 A, P
limit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
; p& n8 J6 A% |6 `* Pof micropenis is important, because it might be the only
6 L0 G8 Q7 m7 K* ~$ l( L9 R6 Nobvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-6 b) n/ H8 U1 }) W Z
monal deficiencies (17) .
* j- f1 ?) k. ~. K( d) WThe timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
3 j- ]1 d$ D5 \6 o! }5 Nborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
$ `* f7 g2 t' v1 oweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level) W- }8 M9 T3 c' ~# ?' U+ Y; N
was measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a! @0 t5 b0 f' r% E0 H1 H
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
7 x ?) p: r3 l( b+ Umake sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
$ C1 U* a" f) ]& X0 Q5 i2 C8 jwere discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a
: Z' y' f: a z' Xlinear relationship between penile length and testosterone: F" ^0 v! p: z2 u5 |2 y& @
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-
, i! B2 }6 |7 v$ v2 n* q' a) Q' @nates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group," q. y7 v: O0 m
which could be related to the lower testosterone levels in
! g0 X. Z) o, ^$ }, i1 I; Pthe exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis8 ? J/ S% m d
syndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or- G) z6 A( S U* g) _! `
environmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies. I) t2 }3 J7 _, N0 i! ?3 \3 F- T! N
have found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-2 u7 N: j; K9 p, B
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .6 Y" q0 _. o6 Y& l' n$ y; Q
Some reports have suggested an increase in hypo-, V% }' d \: Y6 i, @- B: f
spadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European) Z3 {+ d" Y+ E0 K, X. w! t
and US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical
6 v" y; |0 c0 bdifferences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from: Q, s: `9 |' f% B! t; `
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations( K* E# Y m0 H/ {+ X) V. ]' m
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-
( ^% G& x( v+ z7 e- L9 u9 p) sgraphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
- Z) Z! S6 g6 t& [5 zcritically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,* J0 |& [; A# ~- {
increased exposure to environmental factors affecting4 E; q# \+ z# x, ?0 _/ {, U
androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with, H0 ]* ?) m: v3 O
estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause
& ?" F3 o. B% ]& R# h& ~, Zhypospadias (3, 4) .
9 q0 x) K k! C* u$ uIn Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-
! K$ B. ?5 g0 D' a+ pspadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.
3 x. l$ _ i, Z7 qWhen applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average$ q5 U6 h' j) J: \1 ?4 j
prevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per. }# `. u$ t2 Y! H8 i, F
10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased" Y( ]+ x# L/ P8 ?6 s3 _+ S' N
significantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The
4 b7 H/ M ?( J. Kprevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
0 Y+ N! s# G$ J( G/ mat 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the$ X" [# ?% q3 u( H7 r. @% |7 j- ]
prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .
" Q' s S& [ q8 o3 ~* ?( y4 OWe found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns$ G r' O* o6 F. M& t) M
exposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
5 N4 z; s# C; y; D( ]+ M$ {% ^(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental" K5 h5 b8 n( X8 S! G/ ~0 C
pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.
, \/ I9 v; p" \3 F. f) } EWithin the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
5 T. C# q+ w( n2 L! u- ^have suggested environmental factors as a possible cause
4 B: @/ B7 {# V5 P& ?# V! R, hfor the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in$ r: O' ~3 p- B/ s5 a) ?( h
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/7 ]# x3 _& B; J+ a+ a
occupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy
5 s/ f0 c2 _: z+ [, m% mindicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for
. G$ ?, T1 i- f1 F( c" G1 p4 tthe development of male external genital malformation$ S" f+ H; U2 M3 \) t, A: ]
(27 – 29) .0 u Z( {- k4 P- l% F
Received October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
5 b/ _8 d8 g# k6 U9 epublished online March 18, 2013
% G5 s& {% u. H& W) u. x5 v6 CReferences; ?# w( w p- i" T
1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J7 ~# R. R, s& k1 Y
Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.
/ }9 D" E& l9 I; S% P2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
1 w. |8 \) D; |+ w6 ?. N2 qpometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
4 g" _& y Q' |; C( F8 ~5 Q/ o2007;83:441 – 6.6 v& d& `9 n, N O4 D0 z/ V& H
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.4 Q! ]6 t b" L( v7 L
Environmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of
; S a8 [. b' d$ L4 A( Fmale sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:! f8 z# j2 {" d9 E- R+ i7 H
99 – 105.1 N, J m# k% S6 _1 c8 H
4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling
6 g3 @$ b7 X* b# }3 Asperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?
/ v+ Z* k* z$ i1 hLancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.0 o4 s% k1 `% `, M
5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new8 Q; X# r5 P2 N! W2 n
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:
( \0 _" K1 U4 L1 o+ W/ B7 ~633 – 41.3 C! _6 Z' f; J$ a; ~
6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.; g1 F1 D6 m+ p3 g: |/ K
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic g: p; T/ h9 h6 Z
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.+ `2 \% ?9 d! a* W5 U2 _
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a5 x, s3 R9 R5 ? o" @
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,
, b0 [" D: a6 a' ^8 d2 PUK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on. v" o6 o1 f- t) D6 c1 u
March 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.. b, _! E& a$ Q* u# i
8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary6 d* A$ D. O! F0 O! q; C
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.5 }# D/ E. b. m$ T0 ~ V3 d
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
, @2 l1 d' j b. p2 y+ mAuthenticated
+ k7 Y: j" e" v; r* u$ m2 PDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM: d: D. M! F7 M% E
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513
" L- P6 T8 E3 @7 e' H21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.2 }: f/ ?2 S% H2 [$ }. D
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.5 |* h- q8 k: z. w0 \
Acta Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.6 x$ O( `" f( Q4 S6 I) |
22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two3 U# P$ u' _& ]$ K7 {
US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
. {1 ?6 Y7 j; Q; V- L8 xpenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.
( p& u% A% I6 a& [' eJ Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.* h3 k' f+ U) M3 ?! e {
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.
$ y7 Y- M8 H" f: p/ u. mGenital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J7 [* u2 o3 r7 `+ u5 ?' A! Q2 v% w
9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at
[' X+ i( Y0 r- b1 J; ?, B5 hbirth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
" P8 \) |4 C& t8 h: T, X10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health. e* \$ p$ q6 m
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.+ \$ \# ~: S" }% z. r6 c6 h
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:' ~9 O. r; X5 Y3 q( A
penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.$ s5 U6 v# Y: \3 L
12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring: ^( {- @7 K; g' w
13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term- M6 H7 z1 g) J2 D! a
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.5 L0 |' E2 J$ L6 @$ q9 u
14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore. J7 b& ^" h, g
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.
+ b R! [. \6 k) z+ m1 H# z7 H16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.
3 ~9 u, J5 P! L- RPostnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum h4 s5 G5 W. @' ^) M
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.5 \. x* t% D8 D( j) L* u
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
) t& U" I, q% h, G. v9 C17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F, M3 H! m& y# _' k6 v
et al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study( m ?6 A' I; l0 T6 v+ T0 y
of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology3 _! w+ v6 ?- M+ v( x0 x+ a( m
2007;70:572 – 5.
& A: S0 Q; ~: F( e3 i18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular
: `! ?+ V' x8 j. E* Adysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.
* g' \8 A+ w4 N+ R5 oBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.- X2 G- }( U' @" ?3 n
19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male$ K0 R- J3 o: f/ h$ Y4 W( y0 Y
external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.
2 P1 V: R2 }: C; ~: h20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external+ L: j9 _" Z* K/ w
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.& L) B! a8 ?$ }3 d8 @2 K) Z
23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias" V- f) K9 C, N# n& n+ p/ ^* V7 j. p
and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:4 l9 M4 A+ [4 |. }
297 – 302. M4 K" s& t' S" x& ?
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of5 P$ w: x' ~5 ^9 [7 F9 H4 k
surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
4 ~, N& B7 ]# {2 o! dBrussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis
; a5 b+ S) r e; S+ `( i( O6 rPasteur, 1997.
3 G0 G7 ^4 }' L8 ` j25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence' @% W7 k7 o) F; v" n
of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological# j& J$ p) {2 K1 |% X$ {& k4 ~
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update# w5 U, k. x4 b; V* _
2001;7:282 – 6.8 v- C8 g( Q8 @
26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of1 |) E" @& P3 e9 X
hypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child. p/ \/ w* [6 `1 d; C
2007;92:580 – 4.
) j' |7 w9 S: o/ N O6 m27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital# F& g R8 c- v% C" O
development, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.# R' Q$ u1 R3 ^
28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen0 U) w9 u7 Z7 H7 D( Y
C, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
) |. a, V4 j, j7 U& g. V* g" qendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-; j( j% h% [* w9 q, M1 B3 ]
mations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
. t, M1 Q* Z/ j" d9 K6 HEnviron Health 2011;10:3.
* r. S7 g$ R- o! z% B29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High
- m0 _& q9 l9 ~0 d! [prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an
8 U L+ Y$ P" L d$ B/ H% C7 Yintensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl; ?1 @ k# N2 u( ?
2012;35:253 – 64. |
|